Stop Eating Fish

1. The great unacknowledged environmental disaster of our current age is probably the collapse of fish stocks. Unlike headline-grabbing global warming, this is happening now and the magnitude of the effects are beyond discussion (they are mostly catastrophic).

Furthermore, unlike global warming, over-fishing is one of the few things where consumers are directly at fault and a change in consumer habits in Western nations could have a fast positive impact on the situation on the ground (in terms of global warming, “fast action” means anything that has an impact over the next 40 years; reducing over-fishing could have a large positive impact which would start to see in 4 years).

It is thus a bit puzzling that this doesn’t get more press. I guess a big cod just isn’t a cuddly animal.

2. Good has a well-written report of what’s happening of the American coast (which happens to be the a well-managed coast in the world—elsewhere is generally worse—but the bar is low):

Twenty years ago, if you had come to this spot off Wellfleet or, for that matter, any other along the Atlantic coast of North America, you would have found an ocean still brimming with life. The waters had been fished for hundreds of years, but they still harbored an impressive number of species. And none were more abundant than cod. They seemed innumerable and inexhaustible, and when they disappeared, as if overnight—decimated at last by years of overfishing—it came as a profound shock.

(via Andrew Sullivan)

3. Governments are also at fault:

Many experts think that governments have been too kind to the fishing industry. The European Union, China, Japan, and the United States spend as much as $20 billion a year to subsidize a $90 billion industry.

In the EU, fishing represents one of the failures of the shared-sovereignty principles. Every country seems to have taken upon itself to defend its fishing industry, in a bad case of one special interest (fishers) taking over policy.

4. This is one case where consumers could have an immediate, large-scale positive impact as most fishing is to supply consumers directly. I have stopped buying wild fish at the supermarket. The farm-raised alternatives are much more responsible (especially if they come from decent countries like Chile which take care to minimise the negative impacts of fish farms).

Share

4 comments ↓

#1 Bruce on 09.13.08 at 5:51 am

fISH FARMS IN cHILE DO NOT TRY TO MINIMIZE THE NEGATIVE IMPACT OF THEIR FARMS. lOKK AT THE NEWS, HAVING LIVED IN cHILE NEAR FISH FARMS, i KNOW THEY ARE RUN IRRESPONSIBLY, DESTROY THE ECOLOGY AND HEAVILY USE DRUGS AND ANTIBIOTICS, (HUNDREDS OF TIMES MORE ANTIBIOTICS THAN ARE USED IN FISH FARMS IN Europe) the INDUSTRY IS OUT OF CONTROL IN Chile there IS NO GOVERNMENT OVERSIGHT OR REGULATION . that IS WHY THE FISH INDUSTRY IN Chile IS BEING DEVASTATED BY VIRUSES AND DISEASES CAUSED BY UNSANITARY CONDITIONS AND OVERCROWDING

#2 admin on 09.13.08 at 9:18 am

The Economist seems to disagree with you and find the evidence mixed:

“”"
Hitherto, the evidence has been that Chilean salmon is no worse than other farmed fish—and may be better. Importers have occasionally rejected shipments because of traces of malachite green, a forbidden fungicide, and, on one occasion in Japan, because of excess antibiotic residues.

But a study by American and Canadian scientists published in Science in 2004 found that the Chilean fish contained significantly lower levels of contaminants such as PCBs and dioxins than European salmon (although more than wild salmon). That was probably because Chilean fishmeal, used as feed, comes from cleaner waters.
“”"

I mentioned Chile because that’s what you get more easily here in the US, but I have no particular preference.

*

If you are convinced that farmed fish is bad, then I cannot but tell you not to eat any fish. I believe that farmed raised fish is, by far, the lesser of two evils and eat that.

#3 BW on 09.14.08 at 2:32 pm

http://envirovaluation.org/index.php/2008/09/12/worldwatch_report_fish_farming_for_the_f

A good source of info. about fish farming

#4 Watt Wise, Kilo-Watt Foolish — Mutual Information on 03.10.09 at 4:18 pm

[...] Some people would counter-argue that small environmental measures such as unplugging the laptop charger when not in use should be promoted because they raise awareness even if they are mostly meaningless. I think, however, that we have a mental environmental-caring budget and if we promote the meaningless measures we crowd-out the possibly meaningful measures (like eating less fish). [...]

Leave a Comment