<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Futures (I)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mutualinformation.org/2009/03/futures-i/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mutualinformation.org/2009/03/futures-i/</link>
	<description>Measuring the dependency of different variables</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 03:30:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Miguel Madeira</title>
		<link>http://www.mutualinformation.org/2009/03/futures-i/comment-page-1/#comment-637</link>
		<dc:creator>Miguel Madeira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 15:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mutualinformation.org/?p=242#comment-637</guid>
		<description>Alternative worst case:

The recession continues until next election. The US enters in deflation, sending real interst rates to high values.

To approve a rescue package to finantial sector, Obama has to negotiate with the moderate wing of the Republicans (not only to avoid filibuster, but also because of the &quot;Nay&quot; votes of many left-wing Democrats, who want a swedish-style nationalization). The price: don&#039;t raise taxes on the high incomes.

&quot;Giving money to the banks&quot; and don&#039;t raising the taxes &quot;on the richs&quot; will enrage much of the Democrat base. Combined with unemployment and people being evicted from their house, some occasional riots occur.

Meanwhile, in the &quot;red states&quot;, the &quot;militia movement&quot; reborns, accusing Obama of being a tool of international bankers.

In the republican primaries, a populist candidate (a mix of Buchanan and Huckabee?) emerges, speaking in favour of &quot;law and order&quot;, &quot;protect american jobs&quot;, &quot;low taxes&quot; and against &quot;big government and big bussiness&quot;.

Most moderate, &quot;open borders&quot; and pro-free trade Republicans (David Brooks style?) defect from the party and give support to Obama re-election. However, this is a mixed blessing, because this will make Obama less atractive to the left.

Finally, the election day: in the side of Obama, the minorities (specially blacks) and the social liberal middle-class, but the white working class votes massivly in the Republican candidate (finishing a move that begins in 1968).

The result? Unknown.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alternative worst case:</p>
<p>The recession continues until next election. The US enters in deflation, sending real interst rates to high values.</p>
<p>To approve a rescue package to finantial sector, Obama has to negotiate with the moderate wing of the Republicans (not only to avoid filibuster, but also because of the &#8220;Nay&#8221; votes of many left-wing Democrats, who want a swedish-style nationalization). The price: don&#8217;t raise taxes on the high incomes.</p>
<p>&#8220;Giving money to the banks&#8221; and don&#8217;t raising the taxes &#8220;on the richs&#8221; will enrage much of the Democrat base. Combined with unemployment and people being evicted from their house, some occasional riots occur.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, in the &#8220;red states&#8221;, the &#8220;militia movement&#8221; reborns, accusing Obama of being a tool of international bankers.</p>
<p>In the republican primaries, a populist candidate (a mix of Buchanan and Huckabee?) emerges, speaking in favour of &#8220;law and order&#8221;, &#8220;protect american jobs&#8221;, &#8220;low taxes&#8221; and against &#8220;big government and big bussiness&#8221;.</p>
<p>Most moderate, &#8220;open borders&#8221; and pro-free trade Republicans (David Brooks style?) defect from the party and give support to Obama re-election. However, this is a mixed blessing, because this will make Obama less atractive to the left.</p>
<p>Finally, the election day: in the side of Obama, the minorities (specially blacks) and the social liberal middle-class, but the white working class votes massivly in the Republican candidate (finishing a move that begins in 1968).</p>
<p>The result? Unknown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
